Friday, July 28, 2006
Parking Ticket Newsletter™ July 2006
Dear AppealNow.com™ Reader
This newsletter deals with the following subjects.
Validity of Parking Tickets
The Parliamentary Transport Committee’s Recommendations on Parking The
Starting Your Own Website
Earlier this year I represented Mr. Hugh Moses at his appeals before the Parking Adjudicator. The appeals related to two parking tickets. Although we contested the reasons for the issue of the parking tickets, in one case it was never put on the vehicle or handed to the driver we also contended that the parking tickets did not comply with the Road Traffic Act 1991.
I have also stated that I believe that ALL parking tickets issued in
Here are some of the 104 recommendations
- More leniency by parking attendants - very good idea but not so far incorporated in the new legislation
- All bonuses and targets must be made illegal - but not so far incorporated in the new legislation
- A more motorist-friendly appeals process with a penalty charge discount re-offered after an informal challenge - Good idea but this requires proper training and councils considering appeals properly.
- More power being given to adjudicators is an excellent idea BUT parking adjudicators must be clearly independent i.e. not funded by the councils as at present. Also Adjudicators should be made to follow set procedures in considering evidence which they currently fail to do to the detriment of motorists.
- Parking attendants will be known as civil enforcement officers. A waste of time - People will still call them parking attendants or parking wardens. Absolutely no point in this
The committee has not dealt satisfactorily with the following


2. The committee has failed to deal adequately with the matter of bailiffs pursuing parking fines. This has reached epidemic proportions and must be sorted out NOW.

They are major problems with the Parking Adjudication Service in the